Our Approach

From evidence to action

How we address the challenge

Nature restoration decisions involve complex interactions between ecosystems, economies and people. Understanding these interactions requires more than a single model or indicator. NatuRISE brings together evidence, modelling, valuation and stakeholder knowledge to develop a more complete picture of the benefits, costs and wider impacts of nature restoration.

The project will connect scientific analysis with the needs of those making and implementing restoration decisions — from local and regional authorities to national and EU policy makers.

Our approach follows a simple principle:

“Build better evidence. Connect the pieces. Work with those who will use it. Turn knowledge into practical decision support.”

Our intervention logic

1

Evidence — build and connect the knowledge base

NatuRISE will gather, synthesise and generate evidence on the socio-economic impacts of nature restoration, including benefits and costs that are often difficult to capture.

2

Analysis — understand interactions and impacts

Enhanced models and assessment methods will examine how restoration affects ecosystems, economic activities, territories and people — across different spatial and time scales.

3

Co-creation — work with stakeholders

Policy makers, public authorities, land managers and other stakeholders will help shape the questions, indicators and applications so that the research addresses real decision needs.

4

Tools & knowledge — translate evidence into usable outputs

The project will bring evidence and analysis together through datasets, assessment methods, models, knowledge products and a decision-support tool.

5

Policy & societal impact — support better-informed restoration decisions

The resulting evidence and tools will help decision-makers assess options, understand trade-offs and identify restoration measures that can deliver strong environmental and socio-economic benefits.

What we are doing?

NatuRISE will develop an integrated approach to understanding the full range of impacts associated with nature restoration.

The project will:

strengthen the evidence base on restoration benefits and costs

integrate ecological, economic and social dimensions

test approaches in four real-world case studies

synthesise existing scientific knowledge and identify evidence gaps

examine impacts across territories, sectors and population groups

co-create and evaluate solutions with stakeholders

develop and enhance models for assessing restoration impacts

assess monetary, non-monetary and plural values

translate findings into accessible decision-support tools & knowledge products

NatuRISE will connect these strands to build a more comprehensive understanding of restoration choices.

How the project works

Multi-Level Engagement Framework

NatuRISE combines research and innovation with stakeholder engagement.

The project operates across several levels:

European level

EU-wide evidence and modelling will help identify broader patterns, feedbacks and policy implications.

National level

Assessments explore how restoration policies and measures can affect national economies, sectors and policy objectives.

LOCAL & REGIONAL LEVEL

4 case studies examine restoration choices in real-world contexts, connecting ecological changes with local economic and social conditions.

ACROSS ALL LEVELS

Stakeholder engagement will provide practical knowledge and feedback, helping connect scientific assessment with implementation realities.

Real-world decision contexts

Four case studies

The project’s four case studies provide settings in which methods and models can be applied, tested and refined.

They cover agricultural, forest and freshwater ecosystems and involve stakeholders with direct knowledge of restoration challenges and opportunities.

The case studies will help NatuRISE explore questions such as:

Which restoration measures are relevant in a particular context?

How might different groups and territories be affected?

How can complex assessments be translated into practical choices?

What benefits and costs could they generate?

What constraints could influence implementation?

The aim is to co-create and evaluate approaches in contexts where restoration decisions actually have to be made.

Combining methods to capture the full picture

NatuRISE brings together methods from environmental economics, agricultural and land-use modelling, ecosystem service assessment, spatial analysis, behavioural research and social science. No single method can capture all dimensions of nature restoration. The project therefore combines complementary approaches to assess:

Ecological impacts

How restoration changes ecosystems, biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Economic impacts

How restoration affects production, costs, incomes, employment and wider economic activity.

Social impacts

How restoration can influence health, wellbeing, recreation, perceptions and societal acceptance.

Distributional impacts

How benefits and costs vary between territories, sectors and population groups.

Temporal dynamics

How impacts develop and change over the short, medium and long term.

Wider feedbacks

How changes in one location or sector can affect other parts of the economy, land-use system or society.

Valuing what restoration delivers

A central element of NatuRISE is a broader understanding of value. Some restoration effects can be expressed in monetary terms. Others are better represented through physical indicators, qualitative evidence or alternative valuation approaches. NatuRISE will therefore combine:

Monetary valuation

Assessing benefits and costs where appropriate.

Multi-criteria assessment

Comparing options across multiple objectives and indicators.

Non-monetary valuation

Capturing benefits such as health, wellbeing, recreation and cultural values.

Plural valuation

Recognising that people can value nature in different ways.

Turning data and models into decision-ready evidence

NatuRISE will build on established datasets, models and scientific knowledge while developing new data and methodological capabilities where important gaps remain. The project will work with:

New and existing datasets

Including information on restoration benefits, costs, ecosystem services and distributional impacts.

Evidence synthesis

Systematically bringing together existing research to identify patterns, evidence gaps and relevant effect sizes.

Socio-economic models

Assessing how restoration interacts with agriculture, forestry, markets, employment and the wider economy.

Land-use and spatial models

Examining where impacts occur and how restoration changes land-use patterns and territorial outcomes.

Ecosystem service models

Connecting ecological changes with benefits such as pollination, water regulation, recreation and wellbeing.

Decision-support tools

Translating complex assessments into information that policy makers and implementers can use.

Connecting the models

A key feature of NatuRISE is to connect complementary models so that information can flow between them.

This helps capture feedbacks that may otherwise remain outside individual assessments.

Research developed with those who will use it

Stakeholder engagement is part of how the project will develop and test its research and tools.

The project uses different levels of engagement for different audiences.

Co-design with policy makers

National and EU-level policy makers will help identify relevant policy questions, targets, measures and indicators and provide feedback on emerging findings.

Co-creation with local and regional stakeholders

Stakeholders involved in the four case studies will work with the project to explore restoration priorities, test approaches and assess whether outputs are useful in real decision contexts.

Wider knowledge exchange

The project will engage researchers, NGOs, practitioners, sister projects and wider networks through workshops, learning activities, conferences, webinars and other exchanges.

From consultation to collaboration

The project will create opportunities for stakeholders to:

Identify needs

What questions need answering?

Shape the assessment

Which measures, indicators and impacts matter?

Test the results

Do the assessments make sense in practice?

Explore options

What could different restoration choices mean?

Improve the tools

What would make them more useful and accessible?

This iterative process will help ensure that NatuRISE outputs are scientifically robust, relevant to policy needs and usable in practice.

From complex evidence to practical choices

The ultimate purpose of NatuRISE is not simply to produce new datasets, models or publications. It is to help turn complex evidence into better-informed restoration decisions. The project will translate research into outputs such as:

The project will translate research into outputs such as:

1

Understanding

What could restoration change?

2

Comparing

How do different measures and locations compare?

3

Prioritising

Where could action generate the greatest overall benefits?

4

Planning

What needs to be considered for implementation?

A decision-support perspective

The NatuRISE decision-support approach will bring together monetary and non-monetary evidence to help users explore restoration options.

Depending on the decision context, users will be able to consider questions around:

Benefits and costs

Territorial impacts

Territorial impacts

Trade-offs and synergies

Distributional effects

Alternative restoration options

The aim is to give decision-makers better evidence with which to make their own informed choices.

NatuRISE connects science, policy and practice to make the wider consequences of nature restoration more visible — and the evidence more useful for decisions.